Thesis+statement


 * Huntergathering and civilization thesis (the thesis's before the one below) in disscusion section of home page!**

Thesis statements Han China and Rome 1) In what ways were the economic foundations of the Roman and the Han Empire similar? What were the consequences of the difference? 2) Comepare the institutions of imperial government in Han China to those established in Rome after Augustus? 3) Comepare the social econonic orginizations of rome and Han China 4) Comepare and contrast the factors that lead to, and the effects of, the collapes of ancienct Rome and Han China

1) Rome and China’s main economic main source of interaction was through their trade and argiculture. Where China’s main trade laid subcontinetly the Roman Empire consisted of commercital trade of slaves and their products of grapes and olives in the south and north of Africa, China, and many other nations. Due to to Romes system of slavery they were set back of expanding and proseperity unlike China.

2) Han China's empires resulted in the combining on the Confucian system along with the legalist system resulting in the direct ruling of the people while using the state. The Roman empire after Augusts governments became local due to false trust of the imperial government administration causing more diversity and separation destroying the defense of the nation.

3) Han China and Rome's trading and family where big parts of their civilization. Both Han China and Rome believed in Men dominance of patriarchal families, the difference being that women of Rome had more importance in the nation such as economic functions where the women of Han China were subjected to obey strict subordination. In forms of economically Han China's trade was more subcontinent until the times of the silk road and the farming of rice where seess ROme going as far as trading within Africa of agricultural products and craftwork. 4) In both nations the form of the collapse was based on the peoples rise up against the government structure. The people of Han China had no trust in their government, and through the division of government kingdoms they soon lass the vestiges of their independence. where Rome fall rested upon economic deterioration and population loss.

__Topic sentencs__ 1)The social and econmical differences and similarities between Han china and Rome rely on the interaction within the civilization and out of it. 2)Han China and Rome's social and economicla standings relied on 2 key components, trade and family life. 3)Family life and trade are two of the main formations of making up the social and economical life of both Han China and Rome. 4) carolyn-your social status depended on your Rebeca 1) roman slavery and Han Chinas use of technolagy and labor use in farming
 * Thesis outline (3)**

__Direct comparisons__ 1) agricultural trade (grain) 2) tamisha – china isolsted structure 3) carolyn-anarchy -romes trade with africa

-silk road of china -trading of olives and grapes (big trade) -Rice and religion trade (confucian skims the lines of buddhism) 2) patriarchal families of men dominance and women loyalty

-Women forced to leave their families an move in with the families of the man (china) -Women Had economical economic functions and power within the house hold based on social class (rome) -subordination (both) -protected in forms of abuse (both? just China?) -Put to death if known/caught to be cheating (Rome?) What social structure depended on-love, what you own 3)